Difference between revisions of "Public:Known Game Comonads"
m (typo) |
m |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* $$A \leftrightarrows_k B$$ iff there ''exist'' homomorphisms $$\Ck A \to B$$ and $$\Ck B \to A$$ |
* $$A \leftrightarrows_k B$$ iff there ''exist'' homomorphisms $$\Ck A \to B$$ and $$\Ck B \to A$$ |
||
* $$A \leftrightarrow_k B$$ iff there exist non-empty sets $$F\subseteq \Hom(\Ck A, B)$$ and $$G\subseteq \Hom(\Ck B, A)$$ which are [[Public: |
* $$A \leftrightarrow_k B$$ iff there exist non-empty sets $$F\subseteq \Hom(\Ck A, B)$$ and $$G\subseteq \Hom(\Ck B, A)$$ which are [[Public:Locally invertible sets|locally invertible]] |
||
* $$A \cong_{\mathrm{Kl}(\Ck)} B$$ iff $$A$$ and $$B$$ are isomorphic in the coKleisly category for $$\Ck$$, i.e. there exist homomorphisms $$f\colon\Ck A \to B$$ and $$g\colon\Ck B \to A$$ such that both $$f^* g^*$$ and $$g^* f^*$$ are identities |
* $$A \cong_{\mathrm{Kl}(\Ck)} B$$ iff $$A$$ and $$B$$ are isomorphic in the coKleisly category for $$\Ck$$, i.e. there exist homomorphisms $$f\colon\Ck A \to B$$ and $$g\colon\Ck B \to A$$ such that both $$f^* g^*$$ and $$g^* f^*$$ are identities |
||
Revision as of 16:33, 15 May 2020
In this page we gather the list all comonads we've explored so far.
Convention:
- $$A \leftrightarrows_k B$$ iff there exist homomorphisms $$\Ck A \to B$$ and $$\Ck B \to A$$
- $$A \leftrightarrow_k B$$ iff there exist non-empty sets $$F\subseteq \Hom(\Ck A, B)$$ and $$G\subseteq \Hom(\Ck B, A)$$ which are locally invertible
- $$A \cong_{\mathrm{Kl}(\Ck)} B$$ iff $$A$$ and $$B$$ are isomorphic in the coKleisly category for $$\Ck$$, i.e. there exist homomorphisms $$f\colon\Ck A \to B$$ and $$g\colon\Ck B \to A$$ such that both $$f^* g^*$$ and $$g^* f^*$$ are identities
Typically, each of those equivalences corresponds to a certain logical equivalence. That is, we have that
- $$A \leftrightarrows_k B \qtq{iff} A \equiv^{\exists \Lk} B$$
- $$A \leftrightarrow_k B \qtq{iff} A \equiv^{\Lk} B$$
- $$A \cong_{\mathrm{Kl}(\Ck)} B \qtq{iff} A \equiv^{\Lk^\#} B$$
where $$\exists \Lk$$ is the existential-positive fragment of $$\Lk$$ and $$\Lk^\#$$ is the extension of $$\Lk$$ by adding counting quantifiers $$\exists_{{\geq} n}$$ and $$\exists_{{\leq} n}$$.
Comonad | $$\Ck$$ | $$\Lk$$ | $$\leftrightarrows_k$$ | $$\leftrightarrow_k$$ | $$\cong_{\mathrm{Kl}(\Ck)}$$ | Coalgebras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pebbling | $$\mathbb P_k$$ | $$k$$-variable fragment of FO | ✓ | ✓ with $$I$$-morphisms |
✓ with $$I$$-morphisms |
tree width $${\leq} k$$ |
Ehrenfeucht-Fraissé | $$\mathbb E_k$$ | quantifier rank $${\leq} k$$ fragment of FO | ✓ | ✓ with $$I$$-morphisms |
✓ with $$I$$-morphisms |
tree depth $${\leq} k$$ |
Modal (*) | $$\mathbb M_k$$ | modal depth $${\leq} k$$ fragment of ML | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | synchronization tree depth $${\leq} k$$ |
The comonads marked with ``(*)`` denote the comonads over the category of pointed labeled graphs. The $$\leftrightarrows_k$$, $$\leftrightarrow_k$$, and $$\cong_{\mathrm{Kl}(\Ck)}$$ columns mark whether the equivalence in (1), (2), resp. (3) above holds.