Sp.: I don't know why it works, I don't know why it wouldn't work.
A reply of a speaker after a question from audience:
Sp.: It is not necessary to follow the talk.
Aud.: But I would like to follow the talk.
Conversation after the chairman wanted to break the discussion after the talk:
Aud.: Mr. Chairman wants a break.
Sp.: That is not the point.
Sp.: I don't want to make it hard, I want you to understand.
Sp.: You can always choose what you are going to prove.
Sp.: It will be the variation.
Aud.: Of what?
Sp.: Of a random variable.
Aud.: Of which?
Sp.: Of a very dirty one.
Aud.: Now, it's clear.
Sp.: I hope it's seeable at least from the first desk.
Sp.: It is a sort of important to write correct variables and ranges in the sum.
Sp.: There is a little problem - oh - yes, it works!
Aud.: Can you explain what it is?
Sp.: What is this?
Aud.: Yes, what is it and why does it hold?
Sp.: Later, we will use y's for yolks and x's for eggs.
Sp.: Belive it if you don't understand.
Sp.: Is there anything clear so far?
Aud.: I don't understand - N is an inclusion-wise maximal subset - is it maximal with respect to inclusion? Oh, I now understand.
Sp.: They are drawn near but they are far.